Year Ahead – “Waging Peace” in 2024

Year Ahead – “Waging Peace” in 2024

Year Ahead – “Waging Peace” in 2024 Lieber Institute Senior Fellows Daphné Richemond-Barak and Laurie Blank’s multi-year End of War Project (see here, here, and here) explores a range of legal, strategic, moral and operational questions at the end of war, including...
Lieber Studies POW Volume Symposium – “Accompanying the Force” in Modern Armed Conflict

Lieber Studies POW Volume Symposium – “Accompanying the Force” in Modern Armed Conflict

Lieber Studies POW Volume Symposium – “Accompanying the Force” in Modern Armed Conflict Editor’s note: The following post highlights a chapter of the Lieber Studies volume Prisoners of War in Contemporary Conflict, which will be published 3 March 2023. For a...
Year Ahead – Emerging Technologies and the Collection of Battlefield Evidence

Year Ahead – Emerging Technologies and the Collection of Battlefield Evidence

Year Ahead – Emerging Technologies and the Collection of Battlefield Evidence In a recent series of posts on responsible artificial intelligence (AI), various authors (including Chris Jenks) have discussed the role of “responsibility” in the context of using of...
Ukraine Symposium – Doxing Enemy Soldiers and the Law of War

Ukraine Symposium – Doxing Enemy Soldiers and the Law of War

Ukraine Symposium – Doxing Enemy Soldiers and the Law of War This post was prepared in academic consultation with Major Inna Zavorotko, a lawyer with the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense Legal Division. A fuller treatment of wartime doxing, including in the context of...
Ukraine and the Defender’s Obligations

Ukraine and the Defender’s Obligations

Ukraine and the Defender’s Obligations In a recent post, I expressed my concern over the ability of the modern law of armed conflict (LOAC) to continue to not only regulate hostilities, but also do it in a way that survives actual near-peer conflict. I concluded: The...